In the 1990s, opponents of Christianity made arguments that aimed to disprove God’s existence. But in this age of vague spirituality, people don’t necessarily deny God’s existence; they deny His holiness. The primary attack on Christianity right now is a moral one. Young people don’t wonder if God exists. They wonder if God is good.
Most people who leave the church today make their exit because they reject Christian morality. They get so confused that they come to believe Christians are evil. We used to call that backsliding, but now we call it deconstruction. It goes beyond saying “I will no longer follow Christian morality.” Deconstruction says, “Christian morality is evil.”
The stories we ingest shape the morality we develop, but only to a point. If a story’s morality gets too twisted, the story fails to resonate with readers.
Moral confusion is why movies and TV shows are less entertaining than they used to be. Superhero films don’t resonate with audiences like they used to because they lack moral clarity.
But what is morality? Why is it so important for good stories? How do you put a message into your book without the book becoming preachy?
As you craft your stories, you must consider the moral system your story conveys. If you don’t give considerable thought to your moral system, your book will be preachy; and your story will not be believable.
Fiction can be a powerful tool to demonstrate the consequences of actions. True fiction allows us to learn from the mistakes and triumphs of others.
For example, my family lives by a busy road; and one way I keep my small children from running into that road is by telling them stories of squirrels who ran into the road and got squished. As the fictional squirrel bleeds to death in the road, crying because of the pain, my small children decide in their hearts not to run in the road themselves. The fictional squirrel suffers so my children don’t have to.
The story is more effective than a sermon about the dangers of cars.
But imagine if the squirrel survived getting run over. My story becomes less believable and potentially dangerous for my small children.
When you write a story, you create a world. Part of your world is the moral system. Every time a character makes a choice and experiences a consequence, you reinforce your moral system. If your story feels unbelievable, it may be that your moral system is flawed.
As humans, we each have a conscience that gives us an innate sense of morality (Romans 2:15). Deep down, we know right from wrong; or at least we know the beginnings of right and wrong.
When an author has to warp morality to make a point, the point will conflict with the reader’s conscience; and the story will come across as cheesy or unbelievable.
How to Avoid Hollywood-Style Sermons
An amoral concept has infected Hollywood screenplays and Christian books alike. Some people call it clinicalism, and others call it clinical pluralism. Clinical pluralism is the belief that there is no right or wrong. There is no such thing as evil; there is only trauma. In stories where clinical pluralism is the overarching moral system, villains don’t do evil because they are evil. They do evil because they suffered trauma in the past.
Clinical pluralism is sometimes connected with a Marxist oppressor/oppressed worldview where oppressors are evil, and the oppressed are good. Marxism is an anti-Christian worldview. In Christianity, there are no oppressors or oppressed, slave or free, Jew or Gentile (Galatians 3:28). There are only wretched sinners in need of a Savior. The slave needs salvation as much as his master. The oppressed need a Savior as much as the oppressors do. Being oppressed doesn’t move you one inch closer to the Kingdom, and being an oppressor doesn’t disqualify you from the love of Christ.
Not only is amoral storytelling unchristian, but it is also boring and preachy. We live in a broken world. Everyone experiences trauma. When taken to its logical extreme, amoral storytelling causes villains and heroes to become indistinguishable.
For example, in the older superhero stories, characters like Iron Man had to struggle with their own sin and learn the value of sacrifice. In the newer superhero stories, characters like Captain Marvel can beat up a man and steal his motorcycle because he told her to smile. In the moral system of that movie, Captain Marvel’s actions are justified because she is oppressed, and the man is an oppressor.
For a superhero story to work, the protagonist must be more than merely super. The protagonist must also be a hero. This principle applies not only to superhero films but to fairytales as well.
In the new Snow White movie Disney is making, the lead actress explained that “Snow White doesn’t get saved by the prince, and she doesn’t dream about true love. She dreams about becoming the leader she knows she can be.” In the original story of Snow White, the longing for power and beauty was the motivation of the evil queen. The original fairytale explores the difference between internal beauty and external beauty. It is a profoundly moral story that explores the consequences of the deadly sin of envy.
Writers of the new Snow White want to tell a story about two amoral characters fighting for more power, which makes for a boring story. No one cares which amoral character wins! Once Disney heard the backlash, they delayed the film for a year of reshoots.
Time will tell how the writers decide to solve the problem. Perhaps they will panic into making a shot-for-shot remake of the original.
The absence of morality makes a story boring, but how does it lead to preachiness?
When a story’s moral system is broken, but the writer still wants to convey a message, one of the characters inevitably must give a sermon. The preachiness that results is a problem for Christian books and Hollywood. If you don’t believe me, I have one thing to say: “You’ve got to do better, senator.”
If characters were allowed to suffer the consequences of their actions, the message would be organic; and the sermons would be unnecessary.
How to Write Timeless Stories Readers Want to Read
Contrast clinical pluralism with the morality in the Chronicles of Narnia by C.S. Lewis. The Chronicles of Narnia are 70-year-old Christian books that continue to outsell most Christian novels published today.
What was C.S. Lewis’s secret sauce? He rejected pluralism and wrote deeply moral stories.
C.S. Lewis’s characters are not victims of their upbringing, circumstances, or trauma. They each experience trauma, but they still make decisions and experience the consequences of their actions. Whether they do good or evil, their actions matter.
Taking meaningful action is a key element of an appealing character, but it goes deeper than that.
Lewis’s characters sin. Yes, even the children. In fact, most of the children sin. Edmond is a traitor and a bully. Peter lacks faith. Susan is vain. Diggory is selfish, prideful, and inconsiderate. Don’t get me started on Eustace, Jill, and Aravis.
Sin’s consequences are not glossed over. Aslan suffers for Edmond’s treachery, but Edmond suffers too. He is the only sibling who doesn’t receive a magical gift from Father Christmas.
In The Horse and His Boy, Aslan attacks the child Aravis, tearing up her back with his claws as a punishment for how she treated her slave. Aslan is not Santa Claus. He is not a tame lion, and that is what makes him interesting.
Taming God makes your story less interesting.
While readers have grown tired of reading about villains who are victims of trauma, they are not tired of the White Witch, King Miraz, the Tarkan of Tashbaan, or the Lady of the Green Kirtle.
Lewis doesn’t glamorize sin, but he doesn’t hide from it either. By embracing Christian morality, his books have become timeless. The sins of Eustace, which Lewis portrayed 70 years ago, are the same sins that tempt me today.
From teaching children’s Sunday school, I’ve learned that children pay close attention when I refrain from sanitizing the Bible stories. The more I sanitize biblical stories with my modern sensibilities, the more boring the stories become.
The More Specific the Sin, the More Powerful the Story
In a Christian book, the villains are sinners; but so are the heroes. We all know this, but what is sin? A vague “we are all sinners” is not enough to create interesting characters. That is like saying, “Everyone has a personality.” It’s true but unhelpful.
Writers often ask me to record an episode on the Enneagram, Myers-Briggs, or other personality indicator tools so they can learn to create more differentiated characters. Personality indicators can be useful, but your characters will be even more differentiated if you give each one a specific sin to struggle with. Don’t give your characters a generic personality. Give them a specific personality. Don’t make them generic sinners. Let them sin in specific ways.
What specific sins should my characters struggle with?
So, what specific sins would those be?
You could use the three besetting sins from 1 John 2:16-17:
- The lust of the flesh
- The lust of the eyes
- The boastful pride of life
From one perspective, all sin fits into one of those three categories. And they have responses, such as fasting, almsgiving, and prayer.
You could use the 10 Commandments (Exodus 20)
- You shall have no other gods before the one true God.
- You shall not make or worship idols.
- You shall not take God’s name in vain.
- Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy.
- Honor your father and your mother.
- You shall not murder.
- You shall not commit adultery.
- You shall not steal.
- You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor.
- You shall not covet.
The nice thing about the 10 commandments is that they are already written on the hearts of your readers (Romans 2:15).
You could use the seven deadly sins:
- Lust
- Gluttony
- Greed
- Sloth
- Wrath
- Envy
- Pride
These are the easiest sins to work with because they are so deadly that death is easy to visualize.
You could write characters who struggle with the same sins you struggle with.
- Can your fictional characters face that which you dare not?
- How do they handle their sin?
- Are they a slave to it?
- Do they struggle with it?
- Do they overcome? If so, how?
- How does their interaction with sin affect their interactions with other characters and the plot?
Now Let’s Talk About Temptation and Ethics
- What is the right thing to do?
- Am I going to do the right thing?
Andrew Budek-Schmeisser
I think ’twas Allen Ginsberg said
that all is point of view.
Morality, that fraud, is dead,
and there is nothing that is true.
But then he went and turned around,
and claimed that he was right,
and got himself some sand to pound
in his reductive fight.
The true unfettered libertine
cannot, I think exist,
for once he makes that muse his queen
he simply can’t resist
his dissipation used as goad
for a new and tired moral code.
Karen Marline
Happy new year, Andrew, and well said!!!
Andrew Budek-Schmeisser
Thanks, Karen, and Happy New Year to you!
Priscilla Bettis
Excellent advice, Thomas, thank you!
Marline
That. Was. Fabulous.
Thomas, this exposition was brilliant. I’m going to be printing this one off to keep in my permanent files. You have given me so much to think about and pray over, and I’m very happy I haven’t finished rewriting one of my WIPs yet so I can think my way through applying some of these excellent points. Thank you very much for taking the time and effort to share this with us.
Ginny Graham
Thank you, Thomas. You have given me the direction I needed today as I flesh out the characters in my new draft. Eternally grateful, Ginny
Julia Fenstermacher
Thank you, Thomas!
I’m eager to go back to my WIP and ask myself, what moral code am I teaching? As you taught your little ones through story, we teach through our stories. It’s easy to feel sorry for our traumatized characters, but if we give them that as an excuse to sin, with little or no consequence, we send a false teaching to the world, and will be held accountable with stricter measures (James 3:1-2).
God bless all who read and heed your post with the wisdom to see their work newly and the talent to correct it! 😊🙌
Nancy Lavo
Wow!
Vicki Deem
I’m wondering how to balance the moral lesson and reality. If you’re writing fantasy like Superman or The Chronicles of Narnia, it’s fine for good to always triumph and evil to always be punished. It’s fantasy, and that’s the world all of us would prefer to live in. But reality isn’t always so. Sometimes the squirrel does survive and is only wounded. Sometimes alleged Christians really are evil Then what? We can’t just ignore that reality. A Christianity that lives entirely in a fantasy world isn’t a very useful one
Thomas Umstattd, Jr.
These are good points. I think we need to move away from identity-based morality. Just because someone is oppressed or a Christian, that doesn’t make their actions moral. Many of Jesus’s parables were about false converts (Good Fish/Bad Fish, Parable of the Sower, Wise & Foolish Virgins, Tares & Wheet, Sheep and Goats, etc.). Many people who call Jesus “Lord” will be damned (Matthew 7:22-24). The early Church faced evil Christians, and God struck them dead (Acts 5:1-11).
For a story to work, morality must be more than just “Christians good, unbelievers bad.” That does fit with our observations of the world around us, and it doesn’t fit with scripture. It is also no better than superhero stories that let “heroes” act as villains just because they have an identity of an oppressed class.
Morality is not about identity. It is about action (Samuel 24:13).
Pat Sweet
I agree with Thomas. Our characters should not be squeaky clean. Mine never are. They are real, which means even the Christians among them struggle with sin. But they are critcised for being unlikable. 😐
Carrie Turansky
Wow! Such an interesting and thought-provoking post. Thank you, Thomas!
Favour
This is so timely. I absolutely love this post. While reading, I discovered I actually did some of those things. Thank you very much for pointing that out.
D
Awesome, awesome, awesome article – thank you!
Sy Garte
I agree with all the positive comments on this post, and might add another important aspect of your message. Having been raised in a Marxist, anti-Christian moral milieu, I can testify to the truth of your comments about alternative moral codes. It is distressing and dangerous that the morality of oppression (as you put it) has become mainstream in our culture. As Christians, this is a difficult battle to fight, but I think we must, not just for the sake of our faith, but for the well being of our society. Marxism is an acknowledged failure as a governmental system, and its pernicious moral code will also lead to a failed culture. As a non-fiction writer, I take your words deeply to heart, and think about their potential application beyond the world of Christian fiction. Thank you and God bless.
Lori Altebaumer
Thank you, Thomas! Printing this out and sharing with my writing friends. And I hope that I am creating my stories in such a way that my characters are the ones with broken moral code, but not the story. That is where the truth is found . . . exchanging the morality of the world for the truth of God. Love this post!
Peggy
I love this post. Well-said in an age of moral mush! My one piece of commentary: I would say that Edmund’s sin caused him more grief than simply missing out on Father Christmas’s gift. He wasn’t killed for his sin, obviously, but he did suffer a lot of fear and mistreatment and misery at the hands of the Witch because of his disobedience and treachery. He wasn’t having a grand old time by any means.
Megan Castle
Wow, wow, wow! There are so many quotables here and I love that you listed the deadly sins, reminding us to dare to go there. What I love most about this message is the encouragement to be raw and vulnerable on the page, knowing there is Someone big enough to cover our filthy sins. Knowing this, we should be made free on the page, not paralyzed with bland, vanilla writing that fears being found out. As you so eloquently pointed out with scripture, there is no temptation that is not common to man–which a reader won’t relate to. For those reading this and thinking, “then how come the agents/publishers turned down my manuscript because of X?” I have a hunch they didn’t show the consequences of the character’s poor decisions. And I think that although people do not always see the consequences in obvious ways, the consequences are still there, eating away at their self-esteem, their relationship dynamics, their pride or ego, until they come to a place of repentance.
Rebecca Rhoads
This is a profound post. While I instinctively knew the call for morality is the basis for Christian lit, to have it so well spelled out cemented this precept in my mind. Furthermore, the line between informing morality and preaching morality undergirds this piece so precisely that it should not be discounted without much contemplation if not soul-searching. Thanks, Thomas. Beautifully expressed.
Chongolo
Thank you for sharing this. It was worth it.
Columba Booth
Excellent post, Thomas! Thank you, this is a clear summary of a crucial issue in today’s fiction.
Judy Hudson
Power-packed post, Thomas. Thank you. I can see why my current protagonist is weak — it isn’t clear what sins she struggles with, and how the consequences affect her and others. You’ve put the questions to me in this post & I will be editing with your advice in mind. Again, my thanks.
Felicia Harris-Russell
VERY insightful and chock full of revelation. Thank you!